Oura Ring Gen 4 sensor data, not clinical measurementsN=1 case study, not validated for clinical decisionsHEV diagnosed Mar 18; Day 205 post-ruxolitinibMore
Consumer wearable data can support exploratory review only. The HEV diagnosis, temporally confounded with treatment start, remains a material confounder.

Sequential CausalImpact Analysis

Isolating Jakavi vs. Beta-Blocker Causal Effects
METHODOLOGY

Methodology: Sequential Causal Decomposition

A single pooled CausalImpact analysis confounds the effects of Jakavi (ruxolitinib) and the beta-blocker because both interventions fall within the post-period. This report runs two separate Bayesian Structural Time Series (BSTS) analyses to disentangle their individual contributions:

Run A: Jakavi Effect (Isolated)
Pre-period: 2026-01-08 to 2026-03-15
Post-period: 2026-03-16 to 2026-04-07
Estimates what Jakavi alone does, before the beta-blocker is introduced.
Run B: Marginal Beta-Blocker Effect
Pre-period: 2026-03-16 to 2026-04-07
Post-period: 2026-04-08 to 2026-10-06
Uses the Jakavi-only window as the new baseline, then estimates what the beta-blocker adds on top.

Each run uses 5000 MCMC iterations with weekly seasonality. Posterior tail-area probability < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Credible intervals are 95% highest posterior density.

JAKAVI SIGNIFICANT
In range
2/4
2 favorable
BB SIGNIFICANT
In range
4/4
4 favorable
RUNTIME
2.6s
2 runs x 4 metrics
DATA RANGE
271days
2026-01-08 to 2026-10-06
RUN A

Run A: Jakavi Effect (Isolated)

Jakavi started 2026-03-16. Pre-period: 2026-01-08 to 2026-03-15 (67 days). Post-period: 2026-03-16 to 2026-04-07 (23 days, before beta-blocker).

Metric Absolute Effect Relative Effect 95% CI Tail-area Prob Verdict
HRV Mean RMSSD+0.67 ms+6.6%[-4.38, +5.72]p=0.131Not significant
Lowest Heart Rate-3.25 bpm-4.2%[-15.30, +8.81]p=0.013Favorable
Average Heart Rate-3.46 bpm-4.1%[-18.16, +11.23]p=0.042Favorable
Sleep Efficiency+1.38 %+1.8%[-5.54, +8.31]p=0.052Not significant
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
RUN B

Run B: Marginal Beta-Blocker Effect

Beta-blocker started 2026-04-08. Pre-period (Jakavi-only baseline): 2026-03-16 to 2026-04-07 (23 days). Post-period: 2026-04-08 to 2026-10-06 (182 days).

Metric Absolute Effect Relative Effect 95% CI Tail-area Prob Verdict
HRV Mean RMSSD+17.22 ms+158.9%[+11.90, +22.54]p<0.001Favorable
Lowest Heart Rate-13.44 bpm-18.4%[-42.40, +15.52]p<0.001Favorable
Average Heart Rate-12.93 bpm-15.9%[-43.50, +17.64]p<0.001Favorable
Sleep Efficiency+3.24 %+4.0%[-4.17, +10.65]p<0.001Favorable
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
COMBINED

Combined Timeline View

Full timeline with both intervention points and counterfactual predictions overlaid. Blue dashed = Jakavi counterfactual, purple dashed = BB counterfactual.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
INTERPRETATION

Clinical Interpretation

Summary of each drug's isolated contribution to observed biometric changes. This sequential design helps attribute changes to the correct intervention, though N-of-1 limitations still apply.

Metric Jakavi Contribution Beta-Blocker Contribution
HRV Mean RMSSDNo significant effect detected. Jakavi increased hrv mean rmssd by 0.7 ms (+6.6%), but p=0.131 (not significant).Beta-blocker significantly increased hrv mean rmssd by 17.2 ms (+158.9%), p<0.001 - favorable.
Lowest Heart RateJakavi significantly decreased lowest heart rate by 3.2 bpm (-4.2%), p=0.013 - favorable.Beta-blocker significantly decreased lowest heart rate by 13.4 bpm (-18.4%), p<0.001 - favorable.
Average Heart RateJakavi significantly decreased average heart rate by 3.5 bpm (-4.1%), p=0.042 - favorable.Beta-blocker significantly decreased average heart rate by 12.9 bpm (-15.9%), p<0.001 - favorable.
Sleep EfficiencyNo significant effect detected. Jakavi increased sleep efficiency by 1.4 % (+1.8%), but p=0.052 (not significant).Beta-blocker significantly increased sleep efficiency by 3.2 % (+4.0%), p<0.001 - favorable.

Caution: Run B has a shorter pre-period (Jakavi-only window) which may reduce statistical power. Effects flagged as non-significant may become significant with more post-BB data accumulation. The HEV co-infection is a confounder that cannot be disentangled in this design.