Oura Ring Gen 4 sensor data, not clinical measurementsN=1 case study, not validated for clinical decisionsHEV diagnosed Mar 18; Day 205 post-ruxolitinibMore
Consumer wearable data can support exploratory review only. The HEV diagnosis, temporally confounded with treatment start, remains a material confounder.

Tau-U Effect Size Analysis

Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Phase Comparisons
SUMMARY

Effect Size Summary (A vs B+C)

TAU-U: Mean RMSSD
Large
0.695
Large effect | p<0.001 (trend-corrected)
A vs B+C | NAP=94.4%
TAU-U: Lowest Heart Rate
Large
0.693
Large effect | p<0.001 (trend-corrected)
A vs B+C | NAP=93.5%
TAU-U: Average Heart Rate
Large
0.666
Large effect | p<0.001 (trend-corrected)
A vs B+C | NAP=92.5%
TAU-U: Sleep Efficiency
Moderate
0.515
Moderate effect | p<0.001 (trend-corrected)
A vs B+C | NAP=81.3%
RESULTS

Tau-U Results: All Comparisons

Comparison Metric nA nB MeanA MeanB Dir Tau-U 95% CI p-value Effect NAP Note
A vs B (Jakavi Effect)Mean RMSSD672210.010.9▼-0.192 *[-0.471, +0.088]p<0.001weak62.7%⚠ corrected
A vs B (Jakavi Effect)Lowest Heart Rate641976.772.9▼-0.114 *[-0.411, +0.184]p=0.046weak69.7%⚠ corrected
A vs B (Jakavi Effect)Average Heart Rate641985.281.4▼-0.162 *[-0.459, +0.136]p=0.005weak69.1%⚠ corrected
A vs B (Jakavi Effect)Sleep Efficiency641978.679.9▼-0.018[-0.316, +0.279]p=0.749weak62.4%⚠ corrected
B vs C (BB Marginal Effect)Mean RMSSD2218110.928.1▲+0.954 *[+0.698, +1.000]p<0.001very large97.7%
B vs C (BB Marginal Effect)Lowest Heart Rate1917872.959.4▲+0.886 *[+0.612, +1.000]p<0.001very large94.3%
B vs C (BB Marginal Effect)Average Heart Rate1917881.468.3▲+0.868 *[+0.594, +1.000]p<0.001very large93.4%
B vs C (BB Marginal Effect)Sleep Efficiency1917879.983.4▲+0.539 *[+0.265, +0.813]p<0.001moderate76.9%
A vs B+C (Combined Post)Mean RMSSD6720310.026.2▲+0.695 *[+0.535, +0.855]p<0.001large94.4%⚠ corrected
A vs B+C (Combined Post)Lowest Heart Rate6419776.760.7▲+0.693 *[+0.530, +0.856]p<0.001large93.5%⚠ corrected
A vs B+C (Combined Post)Average Heart Rate6419785.269.5▲+0.666 *[+0.503, +0.829]p<0.001large92.5%⚠ corrected
A vs B+C (Combined Post)Sleep Efficiency6419778.683.1▲+0.515 *[+0.352, +0.678]p<0.001moderate81.3%⚠ corrected
DESCRIPTIVE

Phase Descriptive Statistics

Phase Metric n Mean SD Min Max
AMean RMSSD6710.02.45.018.4
ALowest Heart Rate6476.75.764.096.0
AAverage Heart Rate6485.26.869.8113.9
ASleep Efficiency6478.63.471.091.0
BMean RMSSD2210.92.26.917.7
BLowest Heart Rate1972.94.067.084.0
BAverage Heart Rate1981.44.276.496.4
BSleep Efficiency1979.94.069.087.0
CMean RMSSD18128.18.38.055.4
CLowest Heart Rate17859.46.935.086.0
CAverage Heart Rate17868.37.156.597.8
CSleep Efficiency17883.45.958.092.0
METHODOLOGY

Methodology & Interpretation

Methodology

Tau-U (Parker, Vannest, Davis & Sauber, 2011) is the recommended effect size for single-case experimental designs (SCED). It quantifies the degree of nonoverlap between phases while optionally correcting for baseline trend.

Interpretation Scale

|Tau| < 0.20 = Weak
0.20 – 0.60 = Moderate
0.60 – 0.80 = Large
> 0.80 = Very large

Key Details

  • Positive Tau = improvement (direction-adjusted per metric)
  • Baseline correction: If Phase A shows a significant trend (Kendall tau, p<0.05), Tau-U is corrected by subtracting the baseline S statistic. A ⚠ symbol marks corrected values.
  • NAP (Nonoverlap of All Pairs) is a complementary measure: probability that a random Phase B observation exceeds a random Phase A observation (after direction adjustment). NAP > 0.93 = large, 0.66–0.92 = medium, < 0.66 = weak (Parker & Vannest, 2009).
  • * = statistically significant at p < 0.05

Phases

  • Phase A (Pre-treatment): Jan 08 – Mar 15, 2026
  • Phase B (Jakavi only): Mar 16 – Apr 07, 2026
  • Phase C (Jakavi + Beta-blocker): Apr 08, 2026 – present